The lawsuit against Sage Lewis resulted in a permanent order stating that he cannot put another tent on two specific pieces of land. Other demands from the city, such as the potential for fines or jail time if he put a tent anywhere in Akron or gave a tent to someone to place on personal land, were dropped.

The impact on Lewis's efforts to help the homeless in Akron was significant. Despite his contention that the ruling was unconstitutional and an illegal use of government overreach, the city of Akron's actions have made it increasingly difficult for him to provide shelter to homeless individuals. The city's stance and legal actions against him have highlighted a broader conflict between local government regulations and individual efforts to address homelessness on private property.

Furthermore, the city's rejection of Lewis's conditional zoning use request led to efforts to find housing for the residents of his camp, but also underscored the city's position that tent encampments should not be a permanent solution.